Brahma prakash sharma vs state of up
Web• Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of UP (AIR 1954 SC 10) • The object of contempt jurisdiction is to safeguard the interest of the public which would be adversely affected, if the authority of the court is denigrated and public confidence … WebOct 5, 2024 · By yawalekarsnehan Updated: Oct. 5, 2024, 6:05 p.m. Slideshow Video. Sign up for free! SHARE THE AWESOMENESS. Training. _abc cc embed. * Powtoon is not …
Brahma prakash sharma vs state of up
Did you know?
WebState Of Uttar Pradesh vs Brahma Datt Sharma And Anr on 25 February, 1987. Equivalent citations: 1987 AIR 943, 1987 SCR (2) 444. Author: K Singh. Bench: Singh, … WebBrahma Prakash Sharma v State of Uttar Pradesh The object of the Contempt jurisdiction was not the protection of the judges from any criticism they may be subjected to as …
WebMay 8, 1953 · Brahma Prakash Sharma and Others. v/s. State of Uttar Pradesh. Decided On, 08 May 1953. At, Supreme Court of India. By, HON'BLE JUSTICE B. K. … http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/vishram-singh-raghubanshi-vs-state-of-u-p
WebJan 28, 2024 · The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Brahma Prakash Sharma vs State of U.P. (1953) said: “It would be only repeating what has been said so often by various Judges that the... http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/vishram-singh-raghubanshi-vs-state-of-u-p
WebThe Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Brahma Prakash Sharma vs State of U.P. (1953) had taken cognisance that object of contempt proceedings is not to afford protection to Judges, personally from imputations to which they may be exposed as individuals; it is intended to be a protection to the public whose interests would be very much ...
http://www.lc2.du.ac.in/DATA/C.%20Ravichnadran%20Iyer%20v.%20Justice%20A.M%20Bhattacharjee.pdf bowflex credit card log inWebJun 15, 2011 · (See Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of U.P AIR 1954 SC 10 and Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1971 SC 221.) 15. In Delhi Judicial Service Assn. v. State of Gujarat AIR 1991 SC 2176 this Court held that: (SCC p. 458, para 43) “43. … gulf of boothia countryWebJun 15, 2011 · Supreme Court of India. Vishram Singh Raghubanshi Vs. State of U.P. by Court Verdict · June 15, 2011. Email. Appeal: Criminal Appeal No. 697 of 2006. [From … gulf of boniWebApr 7, 2024 · The petitioner (an advocate) has initiated the PIL under Article 32 seeking to issue an appropriate writ/ order/ direction restraining permanently the Bar Council of … gulf of boothiaWebJun 15, 2011 · Brahma Prakash Sharma & Ors. v. The State of U.P. [AIR 1954 SC 10] (Para 12) JUDGEMENT: Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, (hereinafter called the `Act 1971′) arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 5.5.2006 passed by the Division Bench of the … bowflex credit card paymentWebMay 2, 2024 · [1] Lord Hewart, the then Lord Chief Justice of England in the case of Rex v. Sussex Justices, [1924] 1 KB 256 [2] In Re: Ajay Kumar Pandey, (1996) AIR 1997 SC 260. [3] Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India, AIR 1998 SC 1895. [4] Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) [5] K. Veeraswamy v. Union of India, (1991). bowflex credit card payment genesisWebBrahma Prakash Sharma vs State of U.P., 1953: The Constitution Bench held that “It would be only repeating what has been said so often by various Judges that the object of contempt proceedings is not to afford protection to Judges, personally from imputations to which they may be exposed as individuals; it is intended to be a protection to ... gulf of boothia discoverer