Bna v. bnb and another 2019 sghc 142
WebJul 10, 2024 · On July 1, 2024, the Singapore High Court handed down its anonymized decision in BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 (“BNA”). The case involved an application under section 10(3) of Singapore’s... WebOct 27, 2024 · The Judge dismissed the jurisdictional challenge in August 2024, giving brief oral grounds, and later supplemented those grounds with full written grounds on 1 July …
Bna v. bnb and another 2019 sghc 142
Did you know?
WebIn its recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court had to determine the law governing an # arbitration clause in order to decide … WebBXY v BXX[2024] SGHC(I) 11 6 18 It was common ground that I should decide the present application de novo: see BCY v BCZ [2024] 3 SLR 357 at [36] and BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 at [10] (the latter case having been decided after the hearing of this application). The Issues 19 The issues in the application were:
WebSep 16, 2024 · Introduction; In December 2024, the Singapore Court of Appeal (“SGCA“) in BNA v BNB ruled on the interpretation of an arbitration agreement that provided for disputes to be submitted to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) for “arbitration in Shanghai”. The SGCA held that “arbitration in Shanghai” naturally referred to the arbitral … WebJul 5, 2013 · For a view from Singapore see BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 reviewed here: the High Court interpreted an express provision for “arbitration in Shanghai” to be an …
WebAug 13, 2024 · 13 August, 2024. In its recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court had to determine the law governing an arbitration … WebNo. In the 2024 case of BNA v BNB and another, [2024] SGHC 142, Vinodh Coormaraswamy J stated specifically as follows (at [52]): ‘I do not accept that the validation principle forms a part of Singapore’s arbitration law’. In considering an appeal from that case, the Singapore Court of Appeal found it ‘unnecessary to deal with some
WebJan 6, 2024 · In BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGCA 84 (“BNA v BNB”), the Singapore Court of Appeal allowed (to an extent) an appeal against the decision of the Singapore …
WebIn its recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court had to determine the law governing an #arbitration clause in... bri pontianakWebJul 29, 2024 · BNA V BNB AND ANOTHER [2024] SGHC 142 — Chancery Law Corporation Our disputes practice group has shifted to 138 Robinson Road #10-02 SG … tcsi statusWebAug 14, 2024 · In 2024, BNA challenged this decision at the High Court of Singapore. The High Court affirmed that the seat of the arbitration was Singapore and thus, the arbitration agreement was valid and the tribunal administered by SIAC has jurisdiction on the disputes between BNA and BNB and another (BNA v BNB and another, [2024] SGHC 142). tcs jada jhelumWebSep 20, 2024 · The Singapore High Court applied this three-stage analysis in its recent decision in BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142 (“BNA”). The Court in BNA also dealt with other intriguing legal issues. In particular, it affirmed the view that in the absence of an express choice of the proper law tc-sestamibiWebMar 10, 2024 · In BNA v. BNB and another , [2024] SGHC 142, [1] the Singapore High Court was tasked to determine the validity of an arbitration agreement. Despite the … tcs jhelumWebAug 16, 2024 · In BNA v BNB and another [2024] SGHC 142, the Singapore High Court dismissed an application challenging an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. The plaintiff argued that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the arbitration agreement was governed by the law of the People’s Republic of China, under which the arbitration agreement was substantively … brippuWebOn July 1, 2024, the Singapore High Court handed down its anonymized decision in BNA v BNB [2024] SGHC 142 (“ BNA ”). The case involved an application under section 10 (3) of Singapore’s International Arbitration … bri png